"Vote Act Now" v. "Team FAST" battle for control of the University of Victoria Students' Society
Elections to the Board of Directors of the University of Victoria Students' Society (UVSS) are in full swing, and for the fourth consecutive year, the election appears to be a classic battle between right- and left-leaning slates. "Putting Students First," a left-leaning slate, had held firm control of the students' union until 2004, when "Students for Change" won two executive seats and four director-at-large positions. In 2005, the "Coalition of Independent Students" won seven director-at-large positions, without winning a single executive position. The 2006 elections were the most contentious, leading to a lawsuit over the position of Chairperson, eventually won by Penny-Lane Beames. In the end, "Students for Progressive Change" won three out of four executive positions, while "Students for Students" won nine out of eleven director-at-large positions.
This year, the left is running under the banner of "Team FAST," where FAST is a double acronym, standing for "For A Sustainable Tomorrow" and "Financial and Social Responsibility; Accessible & Quality Education; Sustainable Campus Life; and Transit & Services." Their executive candidates are:
The Martlet has reported on the initial debate between Tracy Ho and George Robinson. It noted that although Tracy Ho was an experienced candidate, her experience was in the Students' Unions of Vancouver Community College, where she served as Chairperson until Spring 2006, and not the UVSS. In contrast, George Robinson, though never having served as a students' union executive, does have two years' experience serving on Senate.
One thing that I noticed is the lack of incumbents in this race. With the exception of Jamie Strachan (running for re-election as Director of Finance) and Andrew Bateman (running for re-election as director-at-large), all of the candidates have never before served on the UVSS Board of Directors - although some have tried. Depending on the election results, it could end up being that very few of the new members of the Board will have had actual experience serving as a director. A similar situation occurred at the Simon Fraser Student Society in 2006, to decidedly mixed results....
This year, the left is running under the banner of "Team FAST," where FAST is a double acronym, standing for "For A Sustainable Tomorrow" and "Financial and Social Responsibility; Accessible & Quality Education; Sustainable Campus Life; and Transit & Services." Their executive candidates are:
- Tracy Ho for Chairperson (Facebook Group; Weblog)
- Caitlin Meggs for Director of Academics (Facebook Group; Weblog; Spiffy Website)
- Jamie Strachan for Director of Finance (Weblog)
- Dylan Sherlock for Director of Services (Weblog)
- George Robinson for Chairperson (Facebook Group; Webpage)
- Mark Bensler for Director of Academics (Facebook Group; Webpage)
- Arel English for Director of Finance (Facebook Group; Webpage)
- Erica Virtue for Director of Services (Facebook Group; Webpage)
The Martlet has reported on the initial debate between Tracy Ho and George Robinson. It noted that although Tracy Ho was an experienced candidate, her experience was in the Students' Unions of Vancouver Community College, where she served as Chairperson until Spring 2006, and not the UVSS. In contrast, George Robinson, though never having served as a students' union executive, does have two years' experience serving on Senate.
One thing that I noticed is the lack of incumbents in this race. With the exception of Jamie Strachan (running for re-election as Director of Finance) and Andrew Bateman (running for re-election as director-at-large), all of the candidates have never before served on the UVSS Board of Directors - although some have tried. Depending on the election results, it could end up being that very few of the new members of the Board will have had actual experience serving as a director. A similar situation occurred at the Simon Fraser Student Society in 2006, to decidedly mixed results....
Labels: victoria
30 Comments:
Interesting... there was a team at Ryerson who used Accountability, Change, Transparency (ACT) as their motto 3 years ago... they happened to be bankrolled by the conservative party. And lost.
Yeah, it's funny how "accountability" and "transparency" tend to not show up when parties are financed from left-leaning organisations... Good observation.
I doubt that there are any strong political ties behind the acronym - to me it seems somewhat generic and uninspired (maybe that's why they added the "Now"), but considering the size of their slate, it would almost have to be. Definitely not as clever as the fellow at McMaster who stood for EVIL.
The lack of incumbents in this race probably has something to do with how tainted the current board has been. Most students remember last year's election and the controversy that followed.
It's quite strange that there are few incumbents running, for about 15 years the exec has been full of unemployable CFS hacks who stayed in for two terms before taking employment with the CFS for a few years. I think this started with Marne Jensen who ended up having to take the SUBureacracy's General Manager job after the NDP was tossed out of Govt.
Perhaps since the CFS slate didn't take many director at large positions, they now don't have the people to move up which has always been their pattern. The other slate seems to attract the less committed people who don't really know the kind of cesspool they've gotten themselves into. They're less likely to want to stay.
What does it say when the left leaning slate could only field 5 director at large candidates? I know in past years, they have always had the full 11. Maybe viewpoints are shifting.
I think the slate name is just "A.C.T. Now" based on their logo. The only slate that was able to put a website together and fill a slate, and provide email addresses for all their candidates seems like a better choice to me.
What about Vote ACT NOW is right wing?
Some of the seasoned student politics observers here can hopefully help with this mellon-scratcher:
Is the running of "director-at-large" or "college director" positions under a slate in student union elections a new[er] thing? (Newer than slates running for the VP/prez positions, say?)
I don't know about the others but Tracey Ho has a history with the CFS in the 'Pro' category. Though I would like to hope that some of the stuff that has happen at her previous local and stuff that is currently happening re. Douglas and such may have tempered her at least a little bit. When I worked with her she fell into the "H" category in a pretty big way.
The Electoral Office "forgot" to put Mike Waters on the ballots. They have had to close all of the polling stations and they are printing new ballots right now.
I almost didn't believe it when I heard it.
http://www.martlet.ca/view.php?aid=39397
Does anyone know the results of the election?
If you want a severely biased account of how things went down you can read my post on it. Enjoy.
Thanks for the update! Your update also explains the radio silence, the progressive candiates won convincingly therefore no excitment in the land of the CFS liberation front. I suppose it would also be outside of Titus' or CUP's anti CFS mandate to do stories on the involement of the Libs in BC or the Tories in Ontario when it comes to backing candidates.
You maybe missed the fact that the article cited about BC Liberal interference was written by Bryna who is the currently the CUP National Bureau Chief
Correction, she was quoted in the article. She did not write it.
http://martlet.ca/view.php?aid=39419
http://martlet.ca/view.php?aid=39422
http://martlet.ca/view.php?aid=39425
Wow, what exactly happened here?
The UVSS General manager who is huge pro-CFS hired another pro-CFS elections officer. Her bias is completely revealed here http://www.martlet.ca/view.php?aid=39419 when she makes a statment about ACT Now running a negative campaign and freaks out on campus security for not kicking them out of ballot counting.
Come on, UVSS, take your General Manager (Marnie) back. We don't want her any more.
She's supposed to be cleaning up, not firing people! She's 6 weeks late with audited financial statements for our beleaguered Douglas Students' Union. She's brought over her CFS friends from the UVSS to "help" her. And guess what? She just fired a long-term staff member- one of the good ones, not the guy who used $20 000 of students' money to put a down payment on a house. It's the same Marnie who was giving the corrupt labour advice to the impeached Simon Fraser Student Society directors. As I recall, that whole group got impeached and the staff person got her job back!
HELP! GET HER OUT OF HERE!
Who did she bring over from the UVSS?
Ben Johnson, last year's UVSS electoral officer.
"George Pringle said..."
Good god - you're still lingering around student politics? Aren't you in your 50s by now? I though you'd gone to work for the Reform party or something.
I'm no fan of Ms. Jensen, but George Pringle was perhaps the most amusing and pathetic right-wing lunatic/perenial failed elction candidate at UVic when I was there in the 90s, and was already a dinosaur even then.
Shit man, you must be totally bored and lonely to be bothering with this stuff at your age...
"George Pringle said..."
Good god - you're still lingering around student politics? Aren't you in your 50s by now? I though you'd gone to work for the Reform party or something.
I'm no fan of Ms. Jensen, but George Pringle was perhaps the most amusing and pathetic right-wing lunatic/perenial failed elction candidate at UVic when I was there in the 90s, and was already a dinosaur even then.
Shit man, you must be totally bored and lonely to be bothering with this stuff at your age...
George came up with some very good points. You on the other hand have nothing to say. I don't know if you want to go around critizing someone for being too old for student politics since you were in university in the 90's.
RE: "Anonymous said...
... I don't know if you want to go around critizing someone for being too old for student politics since you were in university in the 90's."
I was 18 nor 19 then, and I'm a PhD. student now, so I'm hardly "too old". George, on the other hand, was a man in his 30s or 40s then, who devoted much of his time to political 'struggles' against teenagers, and still generally couldn't get himslef elected (despite his incessant efforts).
The guy is a total rightwing loon (I think he was the main "Reform Party" spokesman on campus at the time), and I'd take anything he says with a grain of salt. He was the laughing-stock of the UVic in the 90s, which is the only reason I even remember him.
From: http://www.publiceyeonline.com/archives/000681.html
"June 30, 2005
Once you pop, the fun don't stop
Those who graduated from the University of Victoria's school of kiddie politics will surely be fascinated to know the infamous George Pringle is now a contributor with North Vancouver Politics. Alumni will remember Mr. Pringle, who eventually went onto become Conservative MP Ted White's executive assistant, as a regular, moss-gathering fixture at the capital city's most esteemed institute of higher learning."
He actually did get himself elected to a few things though (senate, etc.), though lost a fair number of attempts to get on the UVSS board.
Hi Anon/CFS Hack,
Just to correct your lies.
I was 34 when I graduated and your discriminatory comments towards mature students noted.
I served 7 terms on the Senate, 1 term on the Board of Governors, 2 terms as a UVSS Director at Large and one term on the Executive as the Director of Academics. I was also the Chair & CEO of the Martlet as well as the News Editor for a while.
Since then I've worked for two different Members of Parliament and with different Govt agencies such as BC Housing. Right now, I'm working on getting Howard Jampolsky, the UVSS President in 1990 elected as the next MP for Richmond.
And this is a blog, you moron.
George, weren't you North Vancouver Reform/Alliance MP Ted White's assistant? The same Ted White who claimed in Parliament that " My riding has the largest Iranian population in the country. At least 40% of all the Iranians living there are refugee claimants. Most of them are bogus". The same Ted White who ran for parliament in 1993 for the extreme-right "Western Canada Concept" party led by every Canadian holocoust denier's favourite lawyer, Doug Christie? Were you Ted White's assistant when he claimed that 40% of Iranian refugees were "bogus"?
I made a an error. Ted White ran for Doug Christie's Western Canada Concept party in the 1983 Provincial election, and White actually accused THE MAJORITY of Iranian refugees of being 'bogus' in his parliamentary speech (available here: http://www2.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?pub=hansard&mee=81&parl=37&ses=2&language=E&x=1#T1800 ).
Awesome employer, George.
Hi Koby!
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home